From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kolpien v. O'Donnell Lumber Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 14, 1920
191 A.D. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

May 14, 1920.

D. Theodore Kelly and Howard B. Harte, for the appellants.

Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General [ E.C. Aiken, Deputy Attorney-General, and Bernard L. Shientag of counsel], for the respondent State Industrial Commission.

J.L. Hurlbert, for the claimant, respondent.


The O'Donnell Lumber Company is a corporation which runs a planing mill at Dunkirk, N.Y. The claimant was president and general manager, receiving a salary of $2,500 a year. He worked in the lumber yard, cut glass, set glass, operated machinery, including planer, jointer, circular and band saws. The policy of insurance issued to this employer covered the claimant and the premium paid therefor specifically covered his proportion of the insurance. The policy, issued on September 17, 1918, was in effect on December 6, 1918, the day when claimant was injured; while operating the rip saw, a piece of board, wedged in the gig saw, flew, hit his left hand, crippling it. The employer and insurance carrier contend that he is not entitled to compensation because he was president as well as general manager, and that he owned a majority of the stock; that Matter of Bowne v. Bowne Co. ( 221 N.Y. 28) and Kennedy v. Kennedy Mfg. Engineering Co. ( 177 App. Div. 56; reargued, 182 id. 907) settle the law against the claimant. We have written in Hubbs v. Addison Electric Light Power Co. ( 191 App. Div. 765), argued at this term, raising the same question; and we have found that the amendment (Laws of 1916, chap. 622) to section 54 of the Workmen's Compensation Law which went into effect June 1, 1916, adding to the section subdivision 6, took that case, and, if we are right, takes this case, out of the rule laid down in Matter of Bowne v. Bowne Co., cited by appellants, because the amendment was enacted after the accident in Matter of Bowne v. Bowne Co. occurred.

The award should be affirmed.

Award unanimously affirmed.


Summaries of

Kolpien v. O'Donnell Lumber Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 14, 1920
191 A.D. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Kolpien v. O'Donnell Lumber Co.

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 14, 1920

Citations

191 A.D. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
182 N.Y.S. 155