From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koloski v. Blaise Alexander Buick, GMC

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 14, 2022
Civil Action 3:21-1809 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:21-1809

02-14-2022

AMBER KOLOSKI, Plaintiff v. BLAISE ALEXANDER BUICK, GMC Defendant


ORDER

MALACHY E. MANNION United States District Judge

Presently before the court is a motion to dismiss Count 3 of the complaint, filed by the defendant on April 26, 2021 while the case was pending in the EDPA. (Doc. 4). Thereafter, upon agreement of counsel and with permission of the court, the plaintiff was given until May 14, 2021 to file a brief in opposition. While the other issues contained in the motion to dismiss were addressed by counsel (Failure to Exhaust and Change of Venue) (Docs. 8 & 11). No timely brief in opposition has been filed regarding the motion to dismiss Count 3, during the ensuing 9 months. In addition to violating the EDPA judge's order, MDPA Local Rules require a brief in opposition within 14 days. “Any party who fails to comply with this rule shall be deemed not to oppose such motion.” (MDPA L.R. 7.6).

In light of the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Count 3 of the complaint, (Doc. 1), is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Koloski v. Blaise Alexander Buick, GMC

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 14, 2022
Civil Action 3:21-1809 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Koloski v. Blaise Alexander Buick, GMC

Case Details

Full title:AMBER KOLOSKI, Plaintiff v. BLAISE ALEXANDER BUICK, GMC Defendant

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 14, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:21-1809 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2022)