From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kolailat v. McKennett

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Aug 2, 2016
499 Mich. 996 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 153075. COA No. 328333.

08-02-2016

Rola KOLAILAT, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Lindsey McKENNETT, Defendant–Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

McCORMACK, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from this Court's order denying leave to appeal for the reasons identified in my dissenting statement in Mabry v. Mabry, –––Mich. ––––, 2016 WL 4129387 (August 2, 2016) (Docket No. 153082).

BERNSTEIN, J., joins the statement of McCORMACK, J.


Summaries of

Kolailat v. McKennett

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Aug 2, 2016
499 Mich. 996 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

Kolailat v. McKennett

Case Details

Full title:Rola KOLAILAT, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Lindsey McKENNETT…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Aug 2, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 996 (Mich. 2016)
882 N.W.2d 882

Citing Cases

Pueblo v. Haas

Id. at 659, 971 N.W.2d 672.I note that this Court has denied leave to appeal on this issue twice before: in…