From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kokofsky v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 2, 1947
74 N.E.2d 478 (N.Y. 1947)

Summary

In Kokofsky v. City of New York (297 N.Y. 553) and Allenson v. Furman (16 A.D.2d 629) defendants responded to emergencies without delay.

Summary of this case from Middlebrook v. Auletta

Opinion

Argued May 19, 1946

Decided July 2, 1947

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, COLDEN, J.

Charles E. Murphy, Corporation Counsel ( Seymour B. Quel and David M. Fuchs of counsel), for appellant.

Samuel Spevack, Bernard Meyerson and Samuel W. Held for respondents.


Judgments reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts, on the ground there was no evidence of negligence by the defendant. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, THACHER and DYE, JJ. Dissenting: CONWAY, DESMOND and FULD, JJ.


Summaries of

Kokofsky v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 2, 1947
74 N.E.2d 478 (N.Y. 1947)

In Kokofsky v. City of New York (297 N.Y. 553) and Allenson v. Furman (16 A.D.2d 629) defendants responded to emergencies without delay.

Summary of this case from Middlebrook v. Auletta

In Kokofsky v. City of New York (297 N.Y. 553, supra) the plaintiff had arisen from her seat on the bus preparatory to getting off.

Summary of this case from Desmond v. Doyle
Case details for

Kokofsky v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:YETTA KOKOFSKY et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 2, 1947

Citations

74 N.E.2d 478 (N.Y. 1947)
74 N.E.2d 478

Citing Cases

Urquhart v. New York City Transit Authority

This was error. "Proof that a conveyance came to a sudden stop without showing that it was unusually violent…

Middlebrook v. Auletta

"Where an emergency is not created by the defendant's own acts, he is not obliged to exercise the best…