From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koichi Saito v. Patel

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 22, 2024
2:24-cv-65-SPC-KCD (M.D. Fla. Jan. 22, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-65-SPC-KCD

01-22-2024

KOICHI SAITO and LYNNE'A SAITO, Plaintiffs, v. PRATIK PATEL, DECUBAS & LEWIS, PETER LANNING, EX LEGAL PLLC, COLLIER COUNTY ET AL and STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is a review of the docket. A judge must disqualify if her “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). She must also disqualify in certain situations listed in § 455(b). And all doubts are “resolved in favor of recusal.” Murray v. Scott, 253 F.3d 1308, 1310 (11th Cir. 2001). Because Plaintiffs are suing the undersigned in another action, disqualification may be required. So, to avoid even the appearance of partiality or impropriety, the undersigned recuses. See Liljeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 865 (1988).

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Honorable Sheri Polster Chappell is RECUSED from this action.

2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign this case to another United States District Judge in the Fort Myers Division.

DONE and ORDERED


Summaries of

Koichi Saito v. Patel

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 22, 2024
2:24-cv-65-SPC-KCD (M.D. Fla. Jan. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Koichi Saito v. Patel

Case Details

Full title:KOICHI SAITO and LYNNE'A SAITO, Plaintiffs, v. PRATIK PATEL, DECUBAS …

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jan 22, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-65-SPC-KCD (M.D. Fla. Jan. 22, 2024)