From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kohute v. Ganeriwala

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Sep 19, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18cv235 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 19, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18cv235

09-19-2018

KEVIN JAMES KOHUTE, et al. v. MANJU GANERIWALA, et al.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions and recommendation for the disposition of the complaint has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 16), filed on August 9, 2018, recommends that Plaintiffs Kevin James Kohute and Pamela Joyce Nichols' complaint be dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Ms. Nichols, proceeding pro se, filed written objections on August 14, 2018. Mr. Kohute received the Report and Recommendation on August 13, 2018 and has not filed written objections.

Ms. Nichols additionally filed exhibits on August 16, 2018 (Docket No. 18), August 20, 2018 (Docket No. 21) and August 24, 2018 (Docket No. 22).

In her written objections, Ms. Nichols merely asserts that "Kerri Puneky killed [her] sister" and that she is seeking $95,000,000.00. The objection does not assert a basis for diversity jurisdiction or a federal cause of action. As a result, Ms. Nichols has not met her burden of establishing federal jurisdiction and she has not alleged facts stating a cause of action upon which relief may be granted.

See Objection, Docket No. 17. --------

Having made a de novo review of the written objections filed by Ms. Nichols in response to the Report and Recommendation, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 16) as the findings and conclusions of this Court and OVERRULES the objections (Docket No. 17).

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiffs Kohute and Nichols' complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19th day of September, 2018.

/s/_________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kohute v. Ganeriwala

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Sep 19, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18cv235 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 19, 2018)
Case details for

Kohute v. Ganeriwala

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN JAMES KOHUTE, et al. v. MANJU GANERIWALA, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Sep 19, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18cv235 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 19, 2018)