From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kohout v. Bank of America Home Loans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 22, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02811-PAB-CBS (D. Colo. Aug. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02811-PAB-CBS

08-22-2011

DAVID R. KOHOUT, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY NA SUCCESSOR TO COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, DALLAS, TX; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; and QUICKEN LOANS, INC., Defendants.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Amended Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer filed on July 29, 2011 [Docket No. 18]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. See also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on July 29, 2011. No party has objected to the Recommendation.

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) ("[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings"). In this matter, I have reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy myself that there is "no clear error on the face of the record." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, I have concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

This standard of review is something less than a "clearly erroneous or contrary to law" standard of review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

1. The Amended Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 18] is ACCEPTED.

2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 5] is GRANTED and this case is dismissed.

BY THE COURT:

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kohout v. Bank of America Home Loans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 22, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02811-PAB-CBS (D. Colo. Aug. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Kohout v. Bank of America Home Loans

Case Details

Full title:DAVID R. KOHOUT, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS; NATIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 22, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02811-PAB-CBS (D. Colo. Aug. 22, 2011)