From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kohli v. Dayal

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 14, 2022
2:20-cv-00538-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00538-CDS-NJK

12-14-2022

ERIC KOHLI, Plaintiff(s), v. AJAY G. DAYAL, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER

[DOCKET NO. 96]

NANCY J. KOPPE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is a motion for attorney Brandon Phillips to withdraw as counsel for Defendants. Docket No. 96. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 98. Attorney Phillips filed a reply. Docket No. 100. The Court hereby SETS this motion for a hearing at 2:00 p.m. on January 17, 2023, in Courtroom 3C. Defendant Ajay G. Dayal must appear at this hearing in person and the corporate defendants must also appear at the hearing in person through a corporate representative. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS, UP TO AND INCLUDING CASE-DISPOSITIVE SANCTIONS.

The Court reminds the parties that corporations are not permitted to proceed pro se. See United States v. High Country Broad. Co., Inc., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993).

Attorney Brandon must promptly provide Defendants with a copy of this order and must file a proof of service by December 22, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kohli v. Dayal

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 14, 2022
2:20-cv-00538-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Kohli v. Dayal

Case Details

Full title:ERIC KOHLI, Plaintiff(s), v. AJAY G. DAYAL, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 14, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-00538-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 14, 2022)