From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koger v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Bluefield
Nov 24, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-0909 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 24, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-0909.

November 24, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Pending before the court is defendant's motion in limine to exclude any testimony by plaintiff's expert, G. Richard Thompson, that relies on employer contributions to plaintiff's retirement benefits. (Doc. # 83). According to defendant, Mr. Thompson's calculation regarding the value of lost fringe benefits runs afoul of the Supreme Court's decision in Norfolk W. Ry. Co. v. Liepelt, 444 U.S. 490 (1980). At the pretrial conference in this matter, held on October 19, 2009, the court informed the parties that it would allow plaintiff to offer an alternative calculation that was consistent with Liepelt. Plaintiff did so and the amended calculation was presented at trial. Accordingly, defendant's motion is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to all counsel of record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Koger v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Bluefield
Nov 24, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-0909 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 24, 2009)
Case details for

Koger v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

Case Details

Full title:LARRY L. KOGER, Plaintiff, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Bluefield

Date published: Nov 24, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-0909 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 24, 2009)