From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koger v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Bluefield
Nov 16, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-0909 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 16, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-0909.

November 16, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Pending before the court is defendant's motion in limine to exclude the physical limitations assigned to plaintiff by Dr. Robert Kropac. (Doc. # 91). At the final settlement conference on November 16, 2009, the parties agreed that a Daubert hearing on the motion was unnecessary. The court believes that defendant's objections to the proffered testimony go to its weight rather than its admissibility and may be properly explored through cross examination. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

Also pending before the court are defendant's Fed.R.Evid. 602 objections to portions of the videotaped deposition of Dr. Kropac. The court OVERRULES the objections.

Plaintiff also proffered a document to the court outlining his objections to Dr. Kropac's videotaped deposition. Plaintiff seeks the exclusion of the following excerpt: Page 47, line 8 through Page 48, line 4 and Page 48, line 8 through 10. The portions of Dr. Kropac's deposition from Page 47, line 17 through Page 48, line 4, and Page 48, lines 8 through 10 are excluded based on the court's Memorandum Opinion and Order granting plaintiff's motion in limine to preclude any evidence based on plaintiff's alleged alcohol or Xanax abuse. The parties are directed to delete the objectionable testimony from the videotaped deposition.

As to plaintiff's Rule 402 objection regarding the testimony concerning a prior back injury, the court will defer ruling until it hears from defendant on the issue.

By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered November 13, 2009, the court denied plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude this evidence. However, plaintiff's current objection is based on Federal Rule of Evidence 402, which was not addressed in the court's prior order.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to all counsel of record.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Koger v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Bluefield
Nov 16, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-0909 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 16, 2009)
Case details for

Koger v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

Case Details

Full title:LARRY L. KOGER, Plaintiff, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Bluefield

Date published: Nov 16, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-0909 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 16, 2009)