From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koewing v. Thalmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1910
139 App. Div. 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

June, 1910.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ.


The complaint having been dismissed at the close of the testimony, the action of the court was in the nature of a nonsuit and, therefore, not upon the merits. The judgment must, therefore, be modified by striking out the words "on the merits," and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the respondents.


Judgment modified by striking out the words "on the merits," and as modified affirmed, with costs to respondents.


Summaries of

Koewing v. Thalmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1910
139 App. Div. 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

Koewing v. Thalmann

Case Details

Full title:FRANK KOEWING, Appellant, v . ERNST THALMANN and RICHARD LIMBURGER, Doing…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1910

Citations

139 App. Div. 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Gould. No. 1

It is only where a prima facie case is made out, and proof offered to rebut it, that the merits are…