From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koether v. Novasad-White

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 28, 2015
NO. 03-15-00046-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 03-15-00046-CV

08-28-2015

Kirk Koether and Vicki Koether, Appellants v. Amber Novasad-White, Individually and d/b/a Nova Tech Foundation Repair, and John Novosad, Individually and d/b/a Nova Tech Foundation Repair, Appellees


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 15,280, HONORABLE REVA TOWSLEE-CORBETT, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 5, 2015, this Court notified appellants that their brief was due on July 17, 2015, and was overdue. The Clerk requested a response by August 17, 2015, and notified appellants that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if they did not respond to this Court by that date. Appellants have not filed their brief or otherwise responded. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

/s/_________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: August 28, 2015


Summaries of

Koether v. Novasad-White

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 28, 2015
NO. 03-15-00046-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Koether v. Novasad-White

Case Details

Full title:Kirk Koether and Vicki Koether, Appellants v. Amber Novasad-White…

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Aug 28, 2015

Citations

NO. 03-15-00046-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2015)