From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koestler v. Shkreli

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 13, 2022
1:16-cv-07175-DLC (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 13, 2022)

Opinion

1:16-cv-07175-DLC

06-13-2022

THOMAS P. KOESTLER, Petitioner, v. MARTIN SHKRELI, Respondent.


ORDER

DENISE L. COTE, DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court having issued the Order for Turnover and Appointment of Receiver dated August 16, 2021 (ECF #120, the “Receivership Order”) in connection with a Judgment (ECF #22) pursuant to which Derek C. Abbott was appointed as Receiver, among other things, to collect certain assets owned by Judgment Debtor Martin Shkreli (the “Judgment Debtor”) and to sell that stock so as to satisfy the Judgment to the Judgment Creditor; and until the Judgment Debtor has satisfied his obligations to the Judgment Creditor, collect any and all assets or property of the Judgment Debtor which is subject to a certain Forfeiture Order, including those assets actually held by the Government and/or the U.S. Attorney in accordance with the Forfeiture Order as well as others, with said assets to be held and not sold without further order of this Court;

Capitalized terms are as defined in the Order for Turnover and Appointment of Receiver (ECF #120).

The Receiver having made application to the Court for a further order concerning his voting rights with respect to certain shares of Phoenixus owned by the Judgment Debtor;

IT IS ORDERED, that the Receiver's application is granted as follows:

1. The Receiver is authorized to act in the place of the Judgment Debtor (including the right to vote) with respect to all shares of Phoenixus stock the he owns (2, 251, 923 shares) or with respect to which he otherwise enjoys the right to vote by agreement (an additional 579, 338 shares, for a total of 2, 831, 261 shares) (collectively, the “Shkreli Phoenixus Shares”) for the tenure of his term as Receiver (the “Receiver Voting Rights”), subject to further order of this Court. Said actions by the Receiver shall not be deemed in any way a violation of this Court's order in Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Vyer a Pharmaceuticals, LLC, et al., 20 CV 00706 (DLC), dated February 4, 2022 (the “Shkreli Injunction”).
2. In the exercise of the Receiver Voting Rights, the Receiver shall vote, if at all, consistent with his independent view of the facts and circumstances, but may consider the input of all interested parties.
3. Phoenixus, and its governing board of directors, is hereby authorized to accept the direction, vote or other appropriate input from the Receiver as if he were the owner of the Shkreli Phoenixus Shares. Said action by Phoenixus and its board of directors shall not be deemed in any way a violation of the Shkreli Injunction.
4. The relief granted in this Order is without prejudice to any rights or remedies of any party, person or entity except to the extent expressly addressed in this Order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Koestler v. Shkreli

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 13, 2022
1:16-cv-07175-DLC (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Koestler v. Shkreli

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS P. KOESTLER, Petitioner, v. MARTIN SHKRELI, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 13, 2022

Citations

1:16-cv-07175-DLC (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 13, 2022)