From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koerner v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 20, 2012
3:11-CV-0116-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Nov. 20, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-CV-0116-LRH (VPC)

11-20-2012

KELLY KOERNER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES GREG COX, et al., Defendants.

COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Before the court is plaintiff's motion to compel production of discovery, or in the alternative, motion in limine (#54). Defendants opposed the motion (#55), plaintiff replied (#58), and defendants were granted leave to file a sur-reply (#61).

By his motion, plaintiff seeks and ordering compelling the defendants to produce "surveillance videotape used against [him] when finding [him] guilty of the underflying MJ6 'walk away' from camp escape charge." Pursuant to the declaration of Lieutenant Stephen Clark (#61, Ex. A), no such surveillance videotape was reviewed by him in preparation for the disciplinary hearing and no such videotape exists.

Therefore, plaintiff's motion to compel production of discovery, or in the alternative, motion in limine (#54) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: ________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Koerner v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 20, 2012
3:11-CV-0116-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Nov. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Koerner v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:KELLY KOERNER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES GREG COX, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 20, 2012

Citations

3:11-CV-0116-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Nov. 20, 2012)