From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kobrin v. Hull

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 1, 1925
97 N.J. Eq. 546 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

1925

On appeal from a decree or order of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 96 N.J. Eq. 41.

Mr. Milton M. Unger, for the appellant.

Messrs. Rosenkrans Rosenkrans, for the respondent.


The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Kobrin v. Hull

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 1, 1925
97 N.J. Eq. 546 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Kobrin v. Hull

Case Details

Full title:MAYER J. KOBRIN, appellant, v. GEORGE I. HULL et al., respondent

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 1, 1925

Citations

97 N.J. Eq. 546 (N.J. 1925)

Citing Cases

Schwartz v. Battifarano

Usury must be timely and strictly pleaded. Dunlap v. Chenoweth, 88 N.J. Eq. 496 ( Ch. 1917); affirmed, 90…

Lubin v. Rosenthal

Brown v. McIntosh, 39 N.J.L. 22; Hintze v. Taylor, 57 Id. 239; 30 Atl. Rep. 551; Weitz v. Quigley, 88 N.J.L.…