rejecting the defense of impossibility of performance where premised only on assumption of what might have happened
Summary of this case from Perlman v. Pioneer Ltd. PartnershipNo. 819.
May 21, 1956.
Thomas G. Baggot for petitioner.
Russell E. Parsons for respondent.
Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 45 Cal. 2d 784, 291 P. 2d 17.
rejecting the defense of impossibility of performance where premised only on assumption of what might have happened
Summary of this case from Perlman v. Pioneer Ltd. Partnershiprejecting the defense of impossibility of performance where the defense was premised only on what might happen in the future
Summary of this case from Sherwin Alumina L.P. v. Aluchem, Inc.Full title:KNUDSEN CREAMERY CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. OOSTEN
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 21, 1956
Even if deemed negligent as between Jacobs and plaintiff, and even though both members of the crew were in…
Trost v. American Hawaiian Steamship CompanyWhile not squarely in point factually, several decisions of this court seem relevant. In Robinson v.…