From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knox v. State Bank of Albany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 13, 1940
260 App. Div. 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Opinion

November 13, 1940.

Appeal from Albany County Court.


The case was tried in one court room and the verdict of the jury was received in a different one in the absence of counsel for the parties and of the justice who presided at the trial. Counsel for the respondent waited for the return of the jury in the court room where the case was tried, and had no knowledge of the verdict taken elsewhere until the jury had dispersed. The County Court has held that the respondent was deprived of a substantial right to poll the jury when the verdict was returned. ( Warner v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co., 52 N.Y. 437; Eastman Kodak Co. v. Benham, 224 App. Div. 876.) Order appealed from affirmed, with costs. Hill, P.J., Crapser, Heffernan and Foster, JJ., concur; Bliss J., dissents.


Summaries of

Knox v. State Bank of Albany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 13, 1940
260 App. Div. 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Case details for

Knox v. State Bank of Albany

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR S. KNOX, Respondent, v. STATE BANK OF ALBANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1940

Citations

260 App. Div. 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Citing Cases

Duffy v. Vogel

Jonathan M. Landsman, New York City, for appellant. I. Denial of the "absolute right" to poll the jury…

Brigham v. Olmstead

Until it is thus announced there is no verdict. ( Warner v. New York Cent. R.R. Co., 52 N.Y. 437.) Moreover…