From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knox v. Sprague

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1998
255 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 16, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Shapiro, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The complaint stated a cause of action against the appellants sounding in fraud with sufficient specificity so as to comply with CPLR 3016 (b) ( see, Black v. Chittenden, 69 N.Y.2d 665; Lanzi v. Brooks, 43 N.Y.2d 778, 780; F.S. Intertrade Off. Prods. v. Babina, 199 A.D.2d 95; Lawatsch v. Cooney, 20 App. Div. 470).

Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Knox v. Sprague

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1998
255 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Knox v. Sprague

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND C. KNOX, JR., et al., Respondents, v. JAMES T. SPRAGUE, Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 854

Citing Cases

Romanoff Restaurant Cabaret v. Ougoulava

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The Supreme Court properly denied…