From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knox v. Ironshore Indem.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 10, 2021
21 CIVIL 6321 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2021)

Opinion

21 CIVIL 6321 (DLC)

12-10-2021

TESSA KNOX, PAMELA KASSEN, LAURENTINA CHAPARRO, HILLARY CRANDLE, JOY FUSARO, ALYSSA HICKEY, MARGRET HOLCOMB, MICHELLE ORTIZ, TRIPTI PANDEY, WIJDAN SHOUBAKI, JENA TOBAK, CHRISTINA TORRES, and ARISSIA TOSSETTI, Plaintiffs, v. IRONSHORE INDEMNITY INC., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated December 10, 2021, because the Prior Acts Exclusion means that the conduct underlying the Judgment is not covered by the insurance policy that Ironshore issued to Varvatos, Ironshore's motion to dismiss is granted. The plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment and for class certification are denied as moot. Judgment is entered for Ironshore; accordingly, the case is closed.


Summaries of

Knox v. Ironshore Indem.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 10, 2021
21 CIVIL 6321 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Knox v. Ironshore Indem.

Case Details

Full title:TESSA KNOX, PAMELA KASSEN, LAURENTINA CHAPARRO, HILLARY CRANDLE, JOY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 10, 2021

Citations

21 CIVIL 6321 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2021)