From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knox v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Jan 8, 2008
CASE NO. 06-2481 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 06-2481.

January 8, 2008


ORDER


This Court having reviewed the Plaintiff's APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (Doc.# 24), and the DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA (Doc.# 25), and the REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA (Doc. #26), and having conducted a de novo review of the issues raised, finds Plaintiff is a "prevailing party"; the Government's position was not substantially justified; no special circumstances make an award of fees unjust; Plaintiff's fee application was timely; and GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for fees in the amount of $5.791.50 (Doc. #24).

This Court denies the request for an additional 8 hours for time spent in researching and writing the Reply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Knox v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Jan 8, 2008
CASE NO. 06-2481 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Knox v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Robert C. Knox Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: Jan 8, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 06-2481 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2008)