From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Known v. Sco Family Servs. (In re Madison Mia B.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 21, 2018
162 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

6923

06-21-2018

IN RE MADISON MIA B., also known as Madison B., A Dependent Child under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Katherine Janet B., also known as Katherine B. Respondent–Appellant, v. SCO Family Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

Douglas H. Reiniger, New York, for appellant. Carrieri & Carrieri, P.C., Mineola (Ralph R. Carrieri of counsel), for respondent. Diaz & Moskowitz, PLLC, New York (Hani M. Moskowitz of counsel), attorney for the child.


Douglas H. Reiniger, New York, for appellant.

Carrieri & Carrieri, P.C., Mineola (Ralph R. Carrieri of counsel), for respondent.

Diaz & Moskowitz, PLLC, New York (Hani M. Moskowitz of counsel), attorney for the child.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Gische, Andrias, Kapnick, Kern, JJ.

Appeal from order of fact-finding and disposition, Family Court, New York County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about March 3, 2017, which, upon respondent mother's default, determined that she suffers from mental illness, terminated her parental rights to the subject child and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

The order was entered upon the mother's default, and therefore is not appealable (see CPLR 5511 ; see Matter of Felicia Malon Rogue J. [Lena J.] , 146 A.D.3d 725, 46 N.Y.S.3d 66 [1st Dept. 2017] ; Matter of Natalie Maria D. [Miguel D.], 73 A.D.3d 536, 901 N.Y.S.2d 225 [1st Dept. 2010] ).

In any event, clear and convincing evidence, including the psychologist's uncontroverted expert testimony that the mother suffers from severe bipolar disorder, supported the determination that she is presently and for the foreseeable future unable to provide proper and adequate care for the child ( Social Services Law § 384–b[4][c], [6][a] ; Matter of Genesis S. [Irene Elizabeth S.], 70 A.D.3d 570, 895 N.Y.S.2d 85 [1st Dept. 2010] ). Because the mother refused to appear for several scheduled mental health evaluations, petitioner relied upon the mother's detailed mental health records, which revealed that she had exhibited increasingly violent and self-injurious behaviors since the age of seven, resulting in numerous psychiatric hospitalizations throughout her young life. Although the mother had shown some progress in her treatment and had positive interactions with the child during supervised visitation, the expert stated, without contradiction, that she had never experienced a sustained period of improvement.


Summaries of

Known v. Sco Family Servs. (In re Madison Mia B.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 21, 2018
162 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Known v. Sco Family Servs. (In re Madison Mia B.)

Case Details

Full title:In re Madison Mia B., also known as Madison B., A Dependent Child under…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 21, 2018

Citations

162 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
162 A.D.3d 547
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 4639

Citing Cases

Wilmington Tr. N.A. v. Fife

It is not, contrary to plaintiff's arguments, Ms. Fife's role to investigate plaintiff's predecessor. And…

Miguel L. v. Ashley J.L.

To the extent respondent challenges the order granting the petition for custody, contending that the court…