From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Maritza

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 17, 2014
116 A.D.3d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-17

In re GINA MARITZA S., and Others, Dependent Children under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Lisa S., also known as Lisa V., Respondent–Appellant, Episcopal Social Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

Larry S. Bachner, Jamaica, for appellant. Rosin Steinhagen Mendel, New York (Douglas H. Reiniger of counsel), for respondent.


Larry S. Bachner, Jamaica, for appellant. Rosin Steinhagen Mendel, New York (Douglas H. Reiniger of counsel), for respondent.
Richard L. Herzfeld, P.C., New York (Richard L. Herzfeld of counsel), attorney for the children Gina Maritza S., Brianna J.B. and Cassandra Aaliya J.B.

Daniel R. Katz, New York, attorney for the children Jennifer Elizabeth W. and Vincent Taylor W.

Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about February 22, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, after a hearing, determined that respondent-appellant mother had permanently neglected the subject children, terminated her parental rights to the children, and committed custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There was clear and convincing evidence that the agency exerted diligent efforts to reunite the mother with the children by creating a service plan for the mother, referring her to domestic violence counseling and a program for sex abusers, scheduling numerous service plan reviews, and scheduling supervised and unsupervised visitation with the children ( seeSocial Services Law § 384–b[7][a], [f] ). Despite these efforts, the mother failed to address the problems that led to the children's placement into foster care, including the ongoing sexual abuse of the children.

A preponderance of the evidence supports the court's determination that it is in the children's best interests to terminate the mother's parental rights rather than issue a suspended judgment ( see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147–148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ). The mother failed to demonstrate that she had made substantial progress in addressing the problems in her home. RENWICK, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, DeGRASSE, MANZANET–DANIELS, FEINMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Maritza

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 17, 2014
116 A.D.3d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

In re Maritza

Case Details

Full title:In re GINA MARITZA S., and Others, Dependent Children under the Age of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 17, 2014

Citations

116 A.D.3d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2684
983 N.Y.S.2d 727