Opinion
Argued October 6, 1890
Decided January 22, 1891
M.H. Peck for appellant.
Frederick W. Noyes for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except BRADLEY and HAIGHT, JJ., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Knowles v. Erwin
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 22, 1891
124 N.Y. 633 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Knowles v. Erwin
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 22, 1891
124 N.Y. 633 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Knowles v. Erwin
Case Details
Full title:LAURA A. KNOWLES, Respondent, v . WILLIAM J. ERWIN, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 22, 1891
Citations
124 N.Y. 633 (N.Y. 1891)
35 N.Y. St. Rptr. 997
Citing Cases
Ver Standig v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
6 Page on Contracts, p. 5707, sec. 3242; Ehrlich v. The Aetna Life Ins. Co., 88 Mo. 249; Kennerly v.…
Salesky v. Hat Corp. of AmerIndeed in some jurisdictions the courts have held that no rights vest in a donee beneficiary even though…