From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knoop v. United States Tennis Association

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1999
262 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted April 30, 1999

June 14, 1999

Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), entered April 17, 1998.

Jaroslawicz Jaros, New York, N.Y. (David Jaroslawicz and Robert J. Tolchin of counsel), for appellant.

Goldman Grossman, New York, N.Y. (Jay S. Grossman and Eleanor R. Goldman of counsel), for defendant-respondent.

Cerussi Spring, P.C., White Plains, N.Y. (Steven R. Lau, Peter Riggs, Matthew J. Wojtkowiak, and Richard D. Bentzen of counsel), for defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker, LLP, New York, N Y (Judith Zuckerman of counsel), for third-party defendant.

SONDRA MILLER, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, DANIEL W. JOY, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Schmidt, J., at the Supreme Court.


Summaries of

Knoop v. United States Tennis Association

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1999
262 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Knoop v. United States Tennis Association

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD KNOOP, appellant, v. UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 319