Opinion
No. 05-07-00004-CR
Opinion Filed February 29, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F02-35239-PI.
Before Justices MOSELEY, BRIDGES, and LANG-MIERS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Judy Lynn Knipe waived a jury and pleaded guilty to unlawful possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200 grams. See Tex. Health Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (d) (Vernon 2003). The trial court deferred adjudicating guilt and placed appellant on ten years' community supervision. The State later moved to proceed with adjudication of guilt, alleging appellant violated the terms of her community supervision. The trial court granted the motion, adjudicated appellant guilty, and assessed punishment, enhanced by a prior felony conviction, at sixteen years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.