Knight v. Walgreen Co.

Full title: DANIEL KNIGHT, Plaintiff, v. WALGREEN CO.; and DOES 1-20, Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 3, 2023

3:22-cv-05919-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-05919-CRB

01-03-2023

DANIEL KNIGHT, Plaintiff, v. WALGREEN CO.; and DOES 1-20, Defendants.

Allison C. Eckstrom Christopher J. Archibald BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP Christopher J. Archibald Attorneys for Defendant WALGREEN CO. Lilia Bulgucheva BULGUCHEVA LAW, P.C. Lilia Bulgucheva Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL KNIGHT

Hon. Charles R. Breyer, Judge of the U.S. District Court

Allison C. Eckstrom Christopher J. Archibald BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP Christopher J. Archibald Attorneys for Defendant WALGREEN CO.

Lilia Bulgucheva BULGUCHEVA LAW, P.C. Lilia Bulgucheva Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL KNIGHT

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL [FRCP 41(a)]: ORDER

Hon. Charles R. Breyer, Judge of the U.S. District Court

Plaintiff DANIEL KNIGHT and Defendant WALGREEN CO. hereby stipulate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that this action be dismissed with prejudice as to all claims, causes of action, and parties.

Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) Compliance

I, Christopher J. Archibald, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

Christopher J. Archibald

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff DANIEL KNIGHT and Defendant WALGREEN CO. filed a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal. Pursuant to the Parties Joint Stipulation for Dismissal:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THIS CASE IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.