From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knight v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 17, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0751 FCD CMK P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0751 FCD CMK P.

October 17, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel (Doc. 11). The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's September 13, 2007 request for the appointment of counsel (Doc. 11) is denied.


Summaries of

Knight v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 17, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0751 FCD CMK P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Knight v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE D. KNIGHT, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 17, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0751 FCD CMK P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2007)