From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knight v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 7, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0751-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0751-FCD-CMK-P.

June 7, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 8), filed on May 23, 2007.

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not at this time find the required exceptional circumstances.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Knight v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 7, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0751-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2007)
Case details for

Knight v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE D. KNIGHT, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 7, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0751-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2007)