From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knight v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 26, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01082-AP (D. Colo. Aug. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01082-AP

08-26-2011

JAMMIE KNIGHT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Pro se Plaintiff : Jammie Knight For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado DAVID BLOWER Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

Pro se Plaintiff:

Jammie Knight

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

WILLIAM G. PHARO

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

DAVID BLOWER

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: April 22, 2011

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: June 8, 2011

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: August 8, 2011

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate. However, the Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement the record if necessary at the time of the Opening Brief.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

There are no other matters anticipated.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Parties agree to the following proposed briefing schedule:

A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: October 10, 2011

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: November 9, 2011

C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: November 24, 2011

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiffs Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST

COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE

MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL

ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

Jammie Knight

Pro se Plaintiff

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

WILLIAM G. PHARO

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

By:

David Blower

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant.


Summaries of

Knight v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 26, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01082-AP (D. Colo. Aug. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Knight v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JAMMIE KNIGHT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 26, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01082-AP (D. Colo. Aug. 26, 2011)