Opinion
CIV-19-00093-JWD
02-17-2022
1 MIRANDA KNIGHT-BROWN, and 2 JUSTIN LEN BROWN, Plaintiffs, v. (1) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (2) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, (3) CHOCTAW NATION HEALTHCARE SERVICES AUTHORITY, (4) JASON HILL, (5) WILLIAM HAYES, (6) DALE BAUGHMAN, and (7) JOHN DOES 1-30, Defendants.
ORDER
JODI W. DISHMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court are Defendants the United States of America's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 53], William Hayes's and Jason Hill's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 54], and Dale Baughman's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 63] (collectively, “Motions”), all directed at Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. [Doc. No. 51].
Plaintiffs have filed a Second Amended Complaint. [Doc. No. 77]. Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint “supersedes the [complaints before it] and renders [them] of no legal effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Predator Int'l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177, 1180-81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, the Motions are now moot.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss [Doc. Nos. 53, 54, 63] are DENIED as moot and without prejudice.
IT IS ORDERED.