Opinion
Civil No. 05-6338-TC.
November 28, 2005
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin Findings and Recommendation on November 7, 2005, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Plaintiff has timely filed "Conditional Acceptance of [U.S. Magistrate] Thomas M. Coffin's Findings and Recommendation Upon Proof of Claims," which this courts construes as plaintiff's objections. I have, therefore, given de novo review of Magistrate Judge Coffin's rulings.
I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation filed November 7, 2005, in its entirety. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.