From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knickerbocker T. Co. v. Oneonta, C. R. S. R.W

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1905
110 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)

Opinion

December, 1905.


Motion for stay granted, unless plaintiff will stipulate that any of the bondholders may intervene and serve answers on or before 12th December, 1905, to which a reply will be served within three days without the right to said bondholders to amend their answers as of course thereafter. The trial of the action to proceed on eighteenth December as specified in the order of twenty-eighth November. If plaintiff will so stipulate, motion for stay denied. No costs to either party. All concurred. Chester, J., not sitting.


Summaries of

Knickerbocker T. Co. v. Oneonta, C. R. S. R.W

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1905
110 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)
Case details for

Knickerbocker T. Co. v. Oneonta, C. R. S. R.W

Case Details

Full title:Knickerbocker Trust Company, as Trustee, v. Oneonta, Cooperstown and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1905

Citations

110 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)