From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knauss v. U.S. Department of Justice

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 8, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-cv-2636 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 8, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-cv-2636.

October 8, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2010, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 4) filed by the United States Department of Justice, the United States Marshals Service, and the United States Fugitive Task Force, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. In addition, the United States Attorney's Office is directed to ascertain whether Scott Henderschedt is an employee of or was deputized by the United States Marshals Service in New Jersey and to inform the Court of its findings.


Summaries of

Knauss v. U.S. Department of Justice

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 8, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-cv-2636 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Knauss v. U.S. Department of Justice

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH RONALD KNAUSS, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 8, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-cv-2636 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

K.J. ex rel. K.J. v. Greater Egg Harbor Reg'l High Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.

Although courts generally treat a pre-answer motion under Rule 12(b)(1) as a facial challenge, see…

Fourte v. Barilla Appraisal Servs.

And because the United States mounts a factual challenge (see D.E. No. 20 at 2), the Court considers the…