From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knapp v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 12, 1981
405 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-1934.

November 12, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Stanton S. Kaplan, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen T. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Russell S. Bohn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant, having pled nolo contendere to a charge of possession of burglary tools, was placed on probation for three years with adjudication withheld. Twenty-six (26) months later an affidavit of violation of probation was filed. At hearing appellant did not admit the violations and no evidence was taken in support of them. The court announced that it was going to "reinstate" appellant's probation, but would adjudicate him guilty of the offense of possession of burglary tools.

We construe the trial court's act of adjudicating appellant guilty, coming some twenty-six months after the court had initially placed appellant on probation and withheld adjudication, as a modification of the original probation order. Probation orders are not subject to modification except for violation of conditions and then only upon notice and hearing. Buckbee v. State, 378 So.2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Smith v. State, 377 So.2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

The judgment of the trial court dated October 10, 1980 is vacated.

BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Knapp v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 12, 1981
405 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Knapp v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM KNAPP, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 12, 1981

Citations

405 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

White v. State

In so arguing, Appellant points to the general rule that absent a valid finding that a probationer violated…

Weeks v. State

The arguments that appellant raises generally have merit. See Knapp v. State, 405 So.2d 786 (Fla. 4th DCA…