From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knapp v. Hickman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 22, 2006
No. CIV S-05-2520 FCD CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2520 FCD CMK P.

August 22, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights complaint. On July 20, 2006, the court ordered plaintiff to file an amended complaint, which was no longer than twenty pages.

On August 18, 2006, plaintiff filed an "Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time /Or Injunctive Relief." Plaintiff's motion states that all of his legal property was taken from him when he was transferred from Mule Creek State Prison (MCSP) to Deuel Vocational Institute (DVI). Plaintiff states that, while he was housed at MCSP, he completely revised his amended complaint to comply with the court's July 20, 2006 order; however, his revised amended complaint is in the box of legal property which was taken from him.

Good cause appearing, the court grants plaintiff an extension of forty-five days from the date that this order is filed to file his amended complaint. Should plaintiff's legal property not be returned to him in time for him to meet this deadline, plaintiff shall inform the court before or by the end of the forty-five days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Knapp v. Hickman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 22, 2006
No. CIV S-05-2520 FCD CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2006)
Case details for

Knapp v. Hickman

Case Details

Full title:ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP, Plaintiff, v. RODERICK HICKMAN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 22, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2520 FCD CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2006)