From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodney K'napp v. Hickman

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Feb 5, 2008
2-05-CV-2520 FCD CMK P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2008)

Opinion

2-05-CV-2520 FCD CMK P.

February 5, 2008


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' AMENDED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PREPARE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS


Good cause appearing, Defendants Ali, Boyd, C.D. Brown, D. Brown, M. Brown, Broyles, Campbell, Carillo, Cherry, Clevenstine, Danzinger, Doherty, Emigh, Etheredge, Fowler, Gentile, Grannis, Gutierrez, Hansen, Hein, Henderson, Hensley, Hickman, Hogan, Hurdle, Kaiser, Kanipe, Keeland, Kernan, King, Klinefelter, Knipp, Knowles, Kudlata, Laguna, Lattimore, Leeworthy, Lincoln, McNeil, Melching, Mesa, Mynhier, Nelson, Olson, O'Connor, Poe, Presley, Rendon, Reaves, Reyes, Rianda, Robinson, Sauceda, Seinwerth, Silva, Smith, Stanley, Stewart, Subia, Taylor, Uribe, Vasquez, and Warren are granted a thirty-day extension of time to file a reply to Plaintiff's supplemental opposition to their motion to dismiss. Defendants' reply shall be due on or before February 13, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodney K'napp v. Hickman

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Feb 5, 2008
2-05-CV-2520 FCD CMK P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Rodney K'napp v. Hickman

Case Details

Full title:ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP, Plaintiff, v. R.Q. HICKMAN, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Feb 5, 2008

Citations

2-05-CV-2520 FCD CMK P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2008)