From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

K'Napp v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 11, 2009
1:06-cv-01701-LJO-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2009)

Opinion

1:06-cv-01701-LJO-GSA-PC.

June 11, 2009


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Motion #24) FORTY-FIVE DAY DEADLINE


Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 10, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations of May 7, 2009. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Plaintiff is granted forty-five days from the date of service of this order in which to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations of May 7, 2009.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

K'Napp v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 11, 2009
1:06-cv-01701-LJO-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2009)
Case details for

K'Napp v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:ERIC C.R. K'NAPP, Plaintiff, v. D. G. ADAMS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 11, 2009

Citations

1:06-cv-01701-LJO-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wiseman v. Herrera

The Court has previously held that Title 15 of the California Code of Regulations creates no implied private…

Armentero v. Lopez

Moreover, to the extent Plaintiff maintains a civil claim under 15 Cal. Code Reg. § 3141(c)(1), (5), and (6),…