From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KNAM v. CURY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1924
211 App. Div. 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Opinion

December, 1924.


Judgment and order reversed upon the law, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that it was error to deny the motion of defendant, at folio 259 of the record, to strike out all testimony in reference to any conversation had with Henry Evans, by the plaintiff, or any other person, at some time subsequent to the accident. Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

KNAM v. CURY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1924
211 App. Div. 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Case details for

KNAM v. CURY

Case Details

Full title:MARY C. KNAM, Respondent, v. BEDDY CURY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1924

Citations

211 App. Div. 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)