From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knadle v. Kennedy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 16, 2004
876 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 5D03-2852.

Decision filed July 16, 2004.

Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Nancy J. Alley, Judge.

Michael C. Sasso and Brian D. Solomon, of Dempsey Sasso, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioner.

I William Spivey, II of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Orlando, and Elliot H. Scherker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, for Respondent.


DENIED.

SHARP, W., and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

GRIFFIN, J., dissents with opinion.


In my view, there is more to judicial oversight of discovery than just protecting privileges or trade secrets. Issues of cost, burden, relevance and ulterior motives also require attention, especially when non-parties are involved. To do this accurately usually requires more time than trial judges have to devote to it. This case appears to me to be an unhappy example.


Summaries of

Knadle v. Kennedy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 16, 2004
876 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Knadle v. Kennedy

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL D. KNADLE, Petitioner, v. ROGER B. KENNEDY, SR., Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 16, 2004

Citations

876 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)