From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KMB Law Firm, P.A. v. Morsch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Apr 10, 2015
200 So. 3d 77 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 5D14–2629.

04-10-2015

The KMB LAW FIRM, P.A., Appellant, v. Mark V. MORSCH, P.A., etc., et al., Appellees.

Krista M. Bartholomew, of The KMB Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. Mark V. Morsch, Maitland, for Appellee.


Krista M. Bartholomew, of The KMB Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Mark V. Morsch, Maitland, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Soterakis v. Soterakis, 913 So.2d 688, 690 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“In the absence of an adequate transcript on appeal, an order that is not fundamentally erroneous must be affirmed.” (citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979) )).

As the appendix to its initial brief, Appellant filed an affidavit that addressed certain statements allegedly made at the relevant hearing held by the trial court. However, Appellant failed to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), which governs the preparation of a statement of proceedings when no transcript of the proceeding is available. As a result, the affidavit was not considered.


PALMER, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

KMB Law Firm, P.A. v. Morsch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Apr 10, 2015
200 So. 3d 77 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

KMB Law Firm, P.A. v. Morsch

Case Details

Full title:The KMB LAW FIRM, P.A., Appellant, v. Mark V. MORSCH, P.A., etc., et al.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Apr 10, 2015

Citations

200 So. 3d 77 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)