From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klutse v. Rose

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 9, 1991
577 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-1912.

April 9, 1991.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Steve Levine, Judge.

Teresa M. Pooler, Miami, for appellant.

Adorno Zeder and Raoul G. Cantero, III, and Gloria L. Johnson, Coconut Grove, Carmen Dominguez Frick, Miami, for appellees.

Before BASKIN, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.


Based on the evidence presented, the trial court had ample basis on which to conclude that the best interests of the children required denial of visitation at this time. See Adams v. Adams, 376 So.2d 1204, 1205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 1980). The order under review is affirmed.


Summaries of

Klutse v. Rose

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 9, 1991
577 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Klutse v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA KLUTSE, APPELLANT, v. HAROLD ROSE, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 9, 1991

Citations

577 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)