From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klosterman v. Federal Express Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 2000
271 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted February 23, 2000.

April 13, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Federal Express Company and "John Doe" appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated May 18, 1999, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3012(b) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Biedermann, Hoenig, Massamillo Ruff, P.C., New York, N Y (Deirdre A. Dunphy and Anthony W. Eckert III of counsel), for appellants.

Robert George Bombara, Howard Beach, N.Y., for respondents.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Given the short delay and the lack of any prejudice, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellants' motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3012(b) based upon the plaintiffs' failure to timely serve a complaint after a demand therefor was made (see, Kramer v. Rosenthal, 204 A.D.2d 406 ; Reuter v. Schroeder, 195 A.D.2d 543 ;Gordineer v. Gallagher, 160 A.D.2d 672 ; Rait v. Bauer, 121 A.D.2d 704 ).


Summaries of

Klosterman v. Federal Express Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 2000
271 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Klosterman v. Federal Express Company

Case Details

Full title:PETER P. KLOSTERMAN, et al., respondents, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
706 N.Y.S.2d 912

Citing Cases

Pristavec v. Galligan

621; Tutora v Schirripa, 1 AD3d 349). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse for a default…

Mack-Botwe v. Baylis

Thus, in view of the short delay, the showing of a meritorious claim, a lack of prejudice, and based on the…