From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klor v. American Airlines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2003
305 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-06933

Submitted April 29, 2003.

May 19, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated May 1, 2002, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Mark Schwartz, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellants.

Motola Klar Dinowitz Carfora, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Howard P. Klar and Kimberly A. Ricciardi of counsel), for respondents.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint by showing that they neither created an unsafe condition nor had actual or constructive notice thereof (see Rajgopaul v. Toys "R" Us, 297 A.D.2d 728; O'Callaghan v. Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co., 294 A.D.2d 416). In response, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact because they submitted no proof, only speculation, as to what actually may have caused the fall in question (see Rajgopaul v. Toys "R" Us, supra; Marcelle v. New York City Tr. Auth., 289 A.D.2d 459; Pianforini v. Kelties Bum Steer, 258 A.D.2d 634). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

RITTER, J.P., SMITH, GOLDSTEIN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Klor v. American Airlines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2003
305 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Klor v. American Airlines

Case Details

Full title:PHYLLIS KLOR, ET AL., appellants, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 391

Citing Cases

Voyages v. Roger's Pharmacy, Inc.

As the plaintiff raised only mere speculation that the defendant illegally supplied the plaintiff's decedent…

Scott v. Lyceum Theatre Corp.

Mercer v. City of New York, 223 A.D.2d 688 (2nd Dept 1996), affd, 88 N.Y.2d 955 (1996). Defendants must have…