From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klittner v. Klittner

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford at Stamford
Jan 5, 1994
1994 Ct. Sup. 116 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)

Opinion

No. FA87-0086220

January 5, 1994


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: #149 MOTION TO VACATE ALIMONY


The motion to vacate alimony and support is denied.

The dissolution judgment, which incorporated the oral stipulation of the parties, provided for termination of alimony upon the defendant's death. The record reveals that both parties failed to respond affirmatively to the court's question of termination upon remarriage. Instead, both counsel agreed that it was "envisioned" that the defendant would receive alimony for "the rest of [her] life." (See transcript, page 9). When a judgment incorporates the agreement of the parties as stipulated, it is to be regarded as a contract and the agreement construed as a whole. Sanchione v. Sanchione, 30 Conn. App. 516, 521-22. The alimony termination provision is unambiguous and self-executing upon the death of the defendant.

The annuity payments constituted a discrete sum that could be determined at the time of judgment by reference to an actuarial table. As such it is non-modifiable. See Viglione v. Viglione, 171 Conn. 213, 216.

For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff is not entitled to reimbursement of sums paid after the defendant's remarriage to the date of her death.

LEHENY, J.


Summaries of

Klittner v. Klittner

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford at Stamford
Jan 5, 1994
1994 Ct. Sup. 116 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)
Case details for

Klittner v. Klittner

Case Details

Full title:WARREN F. KLITTNER vs. GREGORY KLITTNER, EXECUTOR ESTATE OF LORRAINE VON…

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford at Stamford

Date published: Jan 5, 1994

Citations

1994 Ct. Sup. 116 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)

Citing Cases

Guzman v. Guzman

After Vandal v. Vandal, trial courts have ordered periodic alimony to continue beyond the recipient's…

Guzman v. Guzman

After Vandal v. Vandal, trial courts have ordered periodic alimony to continue beyond the recipient's…