From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klinger v. Dudley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 18, 1975
49 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

July 18, 1975

Appeal from the Chautauqua Trial Term.

Present — Marsh, P.J., Moule, Simons, Mahoney and Del Vecchio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, in accordance with memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The evidence in this negligence action presented questions of fact as to liability and damages and we find no grounds for reversal as to either. The judgment of May 9, 1974 must be modified in the second and third ordering paragraphs to provide that payment of the judgments against the third-party defendants is conditioned upon defendant Leone paying the full amount of the judgment rendered against him (McCabe v Queensboro Farm Prods., 22 N.Y.2d 204; Adams v Lindsay, 77 Misc.2d 824; McLaughlin, New York Trial Practice 171 N.Y.L.J., June 14, 1974, p 4; David E. Siegel, Practice Commentary, McKinney's Cons. Laws of N.Y., Book 7B, CPLR 3019, pp 278-279). We find no merit to the other points raised.


Summaries of

Klinger v. Dudley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 18, 1975
49 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Klinger v. Dudley

Case Details

Full title:LORA H. KLINGER, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 18, 1975

Citations

49 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Valentino v. Thompson

In personal injury actions, plaintiffs Kaban appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County,…

Rochester Plumbing v. Burgart, Inc.

It was an improvident exercise of the court's discretion. Finally, the indemnity judgment in the third-party…