From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klinefelter v. Kaur

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 8, 2021
2:20-cv-01429-JAM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01429-JAM-JDP (PC)

12-08-2021

JEFFREY SCOTT KLINEFELTER, Plaintiff, v. G. KAUR, Defendant.


ORDER SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ECF NO. 31

JEREMY D. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff previously filed a motion asking that summary judgment be entered against defendant. ECF No. 31. The court deferred consideration of that motion and referred the case to the Post-Screening Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) Project to allow the parties to participate in a settlement conference. ECF Nos. 32 & 33. The parties were notified that if the case did not settle, the court would issue an order setting a briefing schedule on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

The court recently granted defendant's motion to opt out of the ADR project. ECF No. 35. The court will therefore set a briefing scheduling for plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

According, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendant shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 31, by no later than December 28, 2021.

2. Plaintiff may file a reply to defendant's opposition, if any, on or before January 11, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Klinefelter v. Kaur

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 8, 2021
2:20-cv-01429-JAM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Klinefelter v. Kaur

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY SCOTT KLINEFELTER, Plaintiff, v. G. KAUR, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 8, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-01429-JAM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2021)