From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kligman v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 2005
19 A.D.3d 168 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

6279.

June 9, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered April 30, 2004, which denied defendant Triumph's motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Morris Duffy Alonso Faley, New York (Pauline E. Glaser of counsel), for appellant.

Alexander J. Wulwick, New York, for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Sullivan, JJ.


Defendant failed to come forward with sufficient evidence demonstrating it did not create the condition that allegedly caused plaintiff to fall and injure herself. Triumph did not present any records as to what work was performed near the accident site, when it was performed or which of Triumph's employees performed it ( Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 NY2d 557).


Summaries of

Kligman v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 2005
19 A.D.3d 168 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Kligman v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA KLIGMAN, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 9, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 168 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
798 N.Y.S.2d 377