From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klesko v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 11, 2012
Case No. 12-11168 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-11168

04-11-2012

LINDSAY KLESKO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL SMITH, LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. SMITH & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Defendants.


Hon. John Corbett O'Meara


ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

On March 15, 2012, Plaintiff Lindsay Klesko filed her complaint alleging sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. Plaintiff does not allege diversity jurisdiction. Although Plaintiff's Title VII claim is cognizable in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the remaining allegations present a claim based on state law. This court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claim so as to avoid jury confusion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966); Padilla v. City of Saginaw, 867 F. Supp. 1309 (E.D. Mich. 1994).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act claim is DISMISSED.

John Corbett O'Meara

United States District Judge

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on this date, April 11, 2012, using the ECF system.

William Barkholz

Case Manager


Summaries of

Klesko v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 11, 2012
Case No. 12-11168 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Klesko v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:LINDSAY KLESKO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL SMITH, LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 11, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-11168 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 11, 2012)