From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klenotic v. Brush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 9, 1951
278 App. Div. 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

April 9, 1951.


Order modified on the law and the facts by striking from the ordering paragraph everything following the word "default". As thus modified, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellants. More than four years elapsed from the time appellants served their notice of appearance and demand for a copy of the complaint to the date of the motion to dismiss. Respondents defaulted on the return of the motion. In the absence of explanation for the delay and default, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to make the failure of respondents to serve a complaint within twenty days a condition of granting the motion. ( McIntyre v. Branner, 214 App. Div. 145; Fischer v. Tushnett, 256 App. Div. 833; Fletcher v. Goodrich Co., 276 App. Div. 844.) Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 841.]


Summaries of

Klenotic v. Brush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 9, 1951
278 App. Div. 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Klenotic v. Brush

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN KLENOTIC et al., Respondents, v. BYRON V. BRUSH et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)