From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klemes v. Sohnen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 1969
32 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

July 7, 1969


Appeal from an order of the Family Court, at a term held in New York County for Kings County, dated February 4, 1969, which transferred the proceeding from that court to the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Kings. Order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the order is a final order which is appealable as of right under section 1012 FCT of the Family Court Act ( Matter of Geraldine B. [ Anonymous] v. Louis B. [ Anonymous], 32 A.D.2d 808). We are also of the view, however, that the alleged assault committed by appellant, the father-in-law of petitioner's daughter, on petitioner, the mother-in-law of appellant's son, was not a family offense under article 8 of the Family Court Act. The parties did not reside together; and in our opinion they were not "members of the same family or household" within the meaning of section 812 of said statute (cf. People v. Williams, 24 N.Y.2d 274). The question is one which this court may consider de novo, despite a contrary determination by another Judge of the Family Court (cf. Walker v. Gerli, 257 App. Div. 249, 251; Rothouse v. Association of Lake Mohegan Park Prop. Owners, 15 A.D.2d 739). Beldock, P.J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Klemes v. Sohnen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 1969
32 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Klemes v. Sohnen

Case Details

Full title:HANNAH KLEMES, Respondent, v. ARTHUR SOHNEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
303 N.Y.S.2d 533

Citing Cases

Sarno v. O'Toole

Counsel for the petitioner in the instant proceeding has cited two cases in support of the proposition that…

Matter of Nadeau v. Sullivan

Resolution of this issue turns on whether petitioner and respondent, who do not share the same living…